United States v. OHagan Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

United States v. OHagan - assay ExampleHis actions would directly impact the sh atomic number 18holders and other stakeholders in the comp both in a big way.In the present case, OHagan has used the non-public information to his advantage to make huge profits, which consequently caused serious losings to other shareholders. Although the way OHagan obtained this information is very nonrepresentational and abstract, his association with the law firm, and in the bidding of takeover makes his case strongly liable to the shareholders under the 10(b). The 10(b) in reality prohibits any act or accomplishment that results in fraud or deceit related to purchase or sale of any security. In the present case, OHagan has involved in an act which is fraudulent and deceitful from other stakeholders of the company.The excerpts from evaluator Ginsbergs decision state, Under the traditional or classical theory of insider trading liability, 10(b and Rule 10b-5 are violated when a corporate insider tr ades in the securities of his corporation on the basis of material, non-public information. The classical theory applies not only to officers, directors, and other permanent insiders of a corporation, but also to attorneys, accountants, consultants, and others who temporarily become fiduciaries of a corporation. rase the law of misappropriation holds that misappropriating confidential information for securities trading purpose would be a breach of responsibility owed to the source of that information, which gives rise to a duty to disclose or abstain. OHagans case is a clear deception of conduct related to securities transactions.The 10(b) holds that any action taken by anyone associated with the principal in any manner and/or had access to non-public information that would be used to their advantage is liable to the shareholders. OHagan although was not an insider, in sense, he had the information about the takeover, and his association with Dorsey